Comments on: NCAA Madness: Don’t Change the Tourny or We’ll Be on You Like Goverment on a Dollar Bill http://www.21stcenturypaladin.com/2010/02/ncaa-madness-dont-change-the-tourney-or-well-be-on-you-like-goverment-on-a-dollar-bill/ Lawful good. Cyber-savvy. In search of the Holy hand grenade. Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:19:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Paladin http://www.21stcenturypaladin.com/2010/02/ncaa-madness-dont-change-the-tourney-or-well-be-on-you-like-goverment-on-a-dollar-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-208935 Paladin Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:52:00 +0000 http://www.21stcenturypaladin.com/?p=3685#comment-208935 Oh logic... you double-edged sword. ;^) Oh logic… you double-edged sword. ;^)

]]> By: Jean Ralphio http://www.21stcenturypaladin.com/2010/02/ncaa-madness-dont-change-the-tourney-or-well-be-on-you-like-goverment-on-a-dollar-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-208934 Jean Ralphio Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:08:12 +0000 http://www.21stcenturypaladin.com/?p=3685#comment-208934 Changing is always tough... I say we put all 347 teams in. I'll work up the brackets. The tournament will begin promptly in November and culminate in late March or Early April as expected. Maybe divide the teams into 32 divisions, round robin play in those divisions, top two from each make it to a field of say 64. Potentially up to 6 in some divisions which are deemed to be stronger and only 1 from the weaker divisions. At that point it'll be a single elimination tournament; win or go home. Potentially we could take the next 32 teams and put them in a secondary tournament which no one will care about who wins, except for the team that wins. It's a rough draft at this point, but it seems like the most logical format. Changing is always tough… I say we put all 347 teams in. I’ll work up the brackets. The tournament will begin promptly in November and culminate in late March or Early April as expected. Maybe divide the teams into 32 divisions, round robin play in those divisions, top two from each make it to a field of say 64. Potentially up to 6 in some divisions which are deemed to be stronger and only 1 from the weaker divisions. At that point it’ll be a single elimination tournament; win or go home.

Potentially we could take the next 32 teams and put them in a secondary tournament which no one will care about who wins, except for the team that wins.

It’s a rough draft at this point, but it seems like the most logical format.

]]>